4.6 Article

Real-World Use of Generic Meropenem: Results of an Observational Study

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10010062

关键词

antimicrobials; meropenem; generic drug; real-world studies; product surveillance; postmarketing; treatment outcome; pharmacovigilance

资金

  1. Center of Excellence in Pharmacovigilance of Vitalis SACI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study observed the therapeutic effect and tolerability of meropenem in routine clinical practice, showing positive outcomes for different types of infections and good tolerance. The results align with clinical studies of the innovator drug.
Background: To determine the therapeutic effect and tolerability of meropenem in routine clinical practice, in terms of clinical and microbiological response. Methods: A real-world, observational, descriptive, longitudinal study with daily monitoring of clinical history records was conducted on all patients who were medically prescribed meropenem during a period between October 2015 and March 2016 at a university hospital in Bucaramanga (Colombia). Results: The study evaluated 84 patients with an average age of 63.2 years, mostly older adults with multiple comorbidities, of whom 54.8% were men. A positive clinical or microbiological response was obtained in 98.8% of the patients. At the end of the treatments, significant improvements in dysthermia (0% vs. 29% at the beginning, p = 0.000), tachycardia (13% vs. 47%, p = 0.049), and leukocytosis (39% vs. 15% at the beginning, p = 0.008) were evidenced. The improvement in the indicator that combines all the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria was also significant (p = 0.000). The treatment was well tolerated, although we identified some non-serious and expected adverse reactions. Conclusions: Generic meropenem proved to be effective and well tolerated for different types of infection in routine clinical practice. The results are consistent with the findings of the clinical studies with the innovator drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据