4.7 Article

Postharvest Reduction of Salmonella enterica on Tomatoes Using a Pelargonic Acid Emulsion

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10010178

关键词

produce safety; postharvest wash; sanitizer; chlorine; peroxyacetic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel produce wash containing PEL emulsions effectively reduced contaminated Salmonella on tomatoes and mitigated subsequent cross-contamination, but had a negative impact on tomato texture. Organic load did not affect the efficacy of the sanitizer across all treatments.
A novel produce wash consisting of pelargonic acid (PEL) emulsions was tested on tomatoes contaminated with a five-serovar Salmonella enterica cocktail. Ability to reduce contamination on the inoculated tomato surface, as well as mitigation of subsequent cross-contamination to uninoculated tomatoes washed in re-used/spent wash water were examined. Sanitizer efficacy was also examined over 1 and 7 d storage time (8 degrees C, recommended for red ripe tomatoes) and in the presence of 0.5% (w/v) organic load. PEL performed statistically the same (p <= 0.05) at both 30 mM and 50 mM concentrations and resulted in greater than 1, 5 and 6 log CFU/g Salmonella reductions at 0 h, 1 d and 7 d, respectively, when compared to a water-only or no rinse (NR) treatment. This was also a significantly greater reduction than was observed due to chlorine (sodium hypochlorite) and peroxyacetic acid (PAA) at all time points (p <= 0.01). Organic load had no impact on sanitizer efficacy for all examined treatments. Finally, PEL had a deleterious impact on tomato texture. At 1 d, ca. 5 N and 7 N were required to achieve tomato skin penetration and compression, respectively, compared to >9 N and 15 N required by all other treatments (p <= 0.05). While PEL sanitizers effectively reduced inoculated Salmonella and subsequent transfer to uninoculated tomatoes, reformulation may be necessary to prevent deleterious quality impacts on produce.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据