4.7 Article

Bioactivity of Hydrolysates Obtained from Chicken Egg Ovalbumin Using Artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) Proteases

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10020246

关键词

angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; antioxidant; artichoke; bioactive peptide; ovalbumin

资金

  1. UCAM Universidad Catolica de Murcia (Spain) [PMAFI-01/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to obtain chicken egg ovalbumin hydrolysates using aspartic proteinases present in extracts from the artichoke flower and evaluate their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and ACE inhibitory activity in vitro. The hydrolysis time and molecular weight significantly influenced the activity of the hydrolysates, with specific peptides showing antioxidant and ACE inhibitory activity.
The aim of this work was to obtain chicken egg ovalbumin hydrolysates using aspartic proteinases present in extracts from the artichoke flower (Cynara scolymus L.) and evaluate their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity in vitro. Hydrolysis time and molecular weight (<3 kDa) had a significant influence on the hypertensive and antioxidant activity of the hydrolysates. The <3 kDa fraction of the 16 h hydrolysate had an ACE inhibitory activity with an IC50 of 64.06 mu g peptides/mL. The fraction <3 kDa of ovalbumin hydrolysate at 2 h of hydrolysis showed a DPPH radical scavenging activity of 30.27 mu M of Trolox equivalents/mg peptides. The fraction <3 kDa of the hydrolysate of 16 h had an ABTS(+) caption activity of 4.30 mM of Trolox equivalents/mg peptides. The fraction <3 kDa of the hydrolysate of 2 h had an iron (II) chelating activity of 32.18 mu g peptides/mL. From the peptide sequences identified in the hydrolysates, we detected four peptides (from the BIOPEP database) that were already in their bioactive form (IAAEVYEHTEGSTTSY, HLFGPPGKKDPV, PIAAEVYEHTEGSTTSY, and YAEERYPIL), and are reported to display antioxidant and ACE inhibitory activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据