4.7 Article

Variation in the Chemical Composition of Five Varieties of Curcuma longa Rhizome Essential Oils Cultivated in North Alabama

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10020212

关键词

turmeric; essential oil composition; alpha-turmerone; beta-turmerone; ar-turmerone

资金

  1. USDA/National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)-Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) Project [2016-68006-24785]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turmeric is an important spice and traditional herbal medicine, with its essential oils containing beneficial bioactive components. The study shows that turmeric varieties cultivated in North Alabama have comparable essential oil yields and chemical profiles to those from tropical regions, suggesting their suitability for cultivation and commercialization in the southeastern United States.
Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) is an important spice, particularly is Asian cuisine, and is also used in traditional herbal medicine. Curcuminoids are the main bioactive agents in turmeric, but turmeric essential oils also contain health benefits. Turmeric is a tropical crop and is cultivated in warm humid environments worldwide. The southeastern United States also possesses a warm humid climate with a growing demand for locally sourced herbs and spices. In this study, five different varieties of C. longa were cultivated in north Alabama, the rhizome essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation, and the essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatographic techniques. The major components in the essential oils were alpha-phellandrene (3.7-11.8%), 1,8-cineole (2.6-11.7%), alpha-zingiberene (0.8-12.5%), beta-sesquiphellandrene (0.7-8.0%), ar-turmerone (6.8-32.5%), alpha-turmerone (13.6-31.5%), and beta-turmerone (4.8-18.4%). The essential oil yields and chemical profiles of several of the varieties are comparable with those from tropical regions, suggesting that these should be considered for cultivation and commercialization in the southeastern United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据