4.7 Article

Ocean Acidification and Ocean Warming Effects on Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasi) Early Life Stages

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.597899

关键词

Pacific herring; ocean acidification; ocean warming; early life; teleost

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP)
  2. Huxley College of the Environment at Western Washington University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing green house gas emissions are expected to raise surface seawater temperatures and lead to locally intensified ocean acidity in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) are ecologically and economically important forage fish species native to this region. While the impacts of ocean acidification and ocean warming on organism physiology have been extensively studied, less is known on how concurrent climate change stressors will affect marine fish. Therefore, our study focused on the combined effects of ocean acidification and warming on Pacific herring early life history stages. Pacific herring embryos were incubated under a factorial design of two temperature (10 degrees C or 16 degrees C) and two pCO(2) (600 mu atm or 1200 mu atm) treatments from fertilization until hatch (6 to 15 days depending on temperature). Elevated pCO(2) was associated with a small increase in embryo mortality. Elevated temperature, as a single stressor, generated greater embryo mortality and embryo heart rates, larger yolk areas upon hatch, lower hatching success, and shorter larval lengths; compared with the same parameters measured under ambient temperature. The interaction of elevated temperature and pCO(2) was associated with greater embryo heart rates and yolk areas compared to ambient conditions. This study suggests that while temperature is the primary global change stressor affecting Pacific herring embryology, interaction effects with pCO(2) could introduce additional physiological challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据