4.6 Review

L-Carnitine and Acylcarnitines: Mitochondrial Biomarkers for Precision Medicine

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo11010051

关键词

metabolomics; pharmacometabolomics; mitochondria; metabolism; acyl-carnitine; metabolic flexibility

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01GM1277871, R35GM136312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modern advancements in metabolomics have enabled the discovery of new metabolite biomarkers, with potential clinical applications of L-carnitine and acylcarnitines being explored.
Biomarker discovery and implementation are at the forefront of the precision medicine movement. Modern advances in the field of metabolomics afford the opportunity to readily identify new metabolite biomarkers across a wide array of disciplines. Many of the metabolites are derived from or directly reflective of mitochondrial metabolism. L-carnitine and acylcarnitines are established mitochondrial biomarkers used to screen neonates for a series of genetic disorders affecting fatty acid oxidation, known as the inborn errors of metabolism. However, L-carnitine and acylcarnitines are not routinely measured beyond this screening, despite the growing evidence that shows their clinical utility outside of these disorders. Measurements of the carnitine pool have been used to identify the disease and prognosticate mortality among disorders such as diabetes, sepsis, cancer, and heart failure, as well as identify subjects experiencing adverse drug reactions from various medications like valproic acid, clofazimine, zidovudine, cisplatin, propofol, and cyclosporine. The aim of this review is to collect and interpret the literature evidence supporting the clinical biomarker application of L-carnitine and acylcarnitines. Further study of these metabolites could ultimately provide mechanistic insights that guide therapeutic decisions and elucidate new pharmacologic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据