4.7 Article

Characterization of an ettringite-based thermochemical energy storage material in an open-mode reactor

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.102159

关键词

Ettringite-based material; Dehydration/hydration; Thermochemical energy storage; Fixed-bed reactor

资金

  1. Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (ANRT) of France
  2. LafargeHolcim Innovation Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The energy storage technology based on ettringite shows potential for storing excess solar energy to meet heating needs in buildings. Experimental results demonstrate that this material has high energy storage capacity, low charging temperature, and high power output, making it a promising solution for thermal energy storage.
The mismatch between renewable energy supply and demand requires energy storage technologies to work out the dilemma. In the thermal energy field, ettringite-based energy storage seems to be a good solution thanks to its high energy density and low material cost. It can store excess solar energy to meet the heating and domestic hot water demand in buildings. Therefore, the current work experimentally examines the energetic performance of an ettringite-based material made of commercial cements. The TG-DSC analysis shows the energy storage capacity of the investigated material is as high as 282 kWh/m(3) original hydrated materials. Besides, the laboratory reactor tests prove the charging temperature is as low as 55-65 degrees C for ettringite. Under operating conditions, the average energy-releasing power during the full period is about 33.3 W/kg while the maximum power is about 915 W/kg original hydrated materials, which are significantly higher than most materials from the literature. The best volumetric energy-releasing density and the corresponding prototype storage density of the fixed-bed obtained are 176 kWh/m(3) original hydrated materials and 104 kWh/m(3), respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据