4.7 Article

Effect of physical interaction between polyaniline and metal phosphate nanocomposite as positive electrode for supercapattery

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101850

关键词

Supercapattery; Nanocomposite; Nickel phosphate; Silver phosphate; Sonochemical

资金

  1. Collaborative Research in Engineering, Science & Technology Center (CREST) [PV027-2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growth of portable technologies and electrical automotive industry has led to the development of supercapattery, as one of the options in the electrochemical energy storage system. In this work, nanocomposite of polyaniline-metal phosphate (comprising nickel phosphate-silver phosphate (Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4) nanocomposite) was synthesized by two-step route; a combination of sonochemical-calcination method, followed by the physical blending method. Structural and morphology studies reveal that crystalline Ag3PO4 which were decorated on amorphous Ni-3(PO4)(2) were supported by semi-crystalline PANI nanofibers. The electrochemical performance studies show the resultant PANI-Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4 exhibited significantly improved rate capability from 32% (Ni-3(PO4)(2)) to 73% with a maximum specific capacity of 677 C/g. The origin of the outstanding performance shown by PANI-Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4 was due to the synergistic effect produced by the conductive platform provided by PANI, redox behavior of Ni-3(PO4)(2) and extended channels provided by Ag3PO4. In order to evaluate the real-time performance of PANI-Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4, supercapattery devices were fabricated in a configuration of PANI-Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4//activated carbon (AC), Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4//AC and Ni-3(PO4)(2)//AC. PANI-Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4//AC produced a superior performance by providing specific energy of 38.9 Wh/kg at 400 W/kg compared to its counterpart devices. Moreover, the life cycle test of PANI-Ni-3(PO4)(2)-Ag3PO4//AC demonstrated high stability which lost only 12% of its initial capacity after 5000 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据