4.6 Article

Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into methanol over Cu-Ni-TiO2 supported on SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 1157-1161

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.060

关键词

Renewable energy; Carbon dioxide reduction; Carbon dioxide capture; Photosynthesis

资金

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  2. Research Center for Environmental and Hazardous Substance Management (EHSM), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  3. Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management (HSM), Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon over bimetallic-loaded TiO2 supported on SiO2-Al2O3 (Ni-Cu-TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3) catalyst was studied. The study also compared the performance of the catalyst with Degussa P25 (TiO2), prepared TiO2, SiO2-Al2O3 loaded with TiO2. The investigation of catalytic performance was carried out in a batch reactor under UV irradiation. All the samples were characterized by X-ray diffractometer (XRD), N-2 gas adsorption-desorption, and Ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectrometer (UV-Vis-DRS). The result showed SiO2-Al(2)O(3)loaded with Ni-Cu-TiO2 yielded the highest production rate of methanol (405.08 mu mol/g(cat)) after 2 h of reaction under UV at room temperature and a pressure of 1 atm. The photocatalytic reduction rate over the bimetallic-loaded TiO2 supported on SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts was found to be approximately 2.4 times that over SiO2-Al2O3 loaded with TiO2. This can be explained by the presence of nickel and copper on the catalyst which reduced the energy bandgap of the catalyst and decreased the recombination of electron-hole pairs. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 7th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems Engineering, CPESE 2020.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据