4.7 Article

The MUC5B-associated variant rs35705950 resides within an enhancer subject to lineage- and disease-dependent epigenetic remodeling

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.144294

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOD [W81XWH-17-1-0597]
  2. NIH [R01GM125871, 1S10OD012300]
  3. UCSD School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The G/T transversion rs35705950, located 3 kb upstream of the MUC5B start site, is identified as a key risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Through analysis of accessible chromatin and nuclease sensitivity data, it is shown that this region affects the expression of MUC5B and is subject to epigenetic remodeling in IPF patients' lung tissue.
The G/T transversion rs35705950, located approximately 3 kb upstream of the MUCSB start site, is the cardinal risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Here, we investigate the function and chromatin structure of this -3 kb region and provide evidence that it functions as a classically defined enhancer subject to epigenetic programming. We use nascent transcript analysis to show that RNA polymerase II loads within 10 bp of the G/T transversion site, definitively establishing enhancer function for the region. By integrating Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) analysis of fresh and cultured human airway epithelial cells with nuclease sensitivity data, we demonstrate that this region is in accessible chromatin that affects the expression of MUC5B. Through applying paired single-nucleus RNA- and ATAC-seq to frozen tissue from IPF lungs, we extend these findings directly to disease, with results indicating that epigenetic programming of the -3 kb enhancer in IPF occurs in both MUC5B-expressing and nonexpressing lineages. In aggregate, our results indicate that the MUC5B-associated variant rs35705950 resides within an enhancer that is subject to epigenetic remodeling and contributes to pathologic misexpression in IPF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据