4.0 Article

Effect of Functional Groups on the I2 Sorption Kinetics of Isostructural Metal-Organic Frameworks

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 290-293

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.12201

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; Iodine capture; Functional group effects; Sorption kinetics

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2016M2B2A9912217]
  2. DGIST R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and ICT [20-HRHR-ET-09]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [20-HRHR-ET-09] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effect of functional groups on I-2 sorption kinetics using two types of isostructural metal-organic frameworks. UiO-66-(COOH)2 showed the fastest sorption kinetics and highest sorption capacity, while M-2(m-DOBDC) displayed faster chemisorption due to electrophilic aromatic substitution. The mechanisms of I-2 sorption were further supported by fitting the data to pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models.
In this work, the effect of functional groups on I-2 sorption kinetics is investigated using two different types of isostructural metal-organic frameworks, UiO-66-X series (X = H, Br, NO2, NH2, (OH)(2), and (COOH)(2)) and M-2(m-DOBDC) series, (M = Co2+, Mg2+, and Ni2+; m-DOBDC4- = 4,6-dioxo-1,3-benzenedicarboxylate). Among the UiO-66-X series, UiO-66-(COOH)(2) exhibits the fastest sorption kinetics and the highest sorption capacity due to dipole-induced dipole interactions between carboxylic acid groups and I-2 molecules. In addition, faster I-2 chemisorption is observed in M-2(m-DOBDC) because of electrophilic aromatic substitution of m-DOBDC4- with I-2. The I-2 sorption mechanisms are further supported by fitting the I-2 adsorption kinetics data to pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据