4.7 Article

Effects of Nitrogen Forms and Application Rates on Nitrogen Uptake, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Double-Cropping Rice in South China

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11010158

关键词

rice; n application rate; n fertilizer forms; n utilization efficiency; photosynthetic characteristics

资金

  1. Research and Development Program in Key Areas of Guangdong Province, China [2019B020214002]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong [2019B030301007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that urea is a suitable nitrogen source for double-cropping rice planting in South China, which can significantly increase rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency.
Nitrogen is an important element that affects the growth and yield of rice obviously. To explore the effects of nitrogen (N) on the growth of double-cropping rice, four consecutive trials were conducted in South China Agricultural University. Four N forms and five N application rates were set up. Rice N uptake, leaf anatomic structure, leaf fluorescence parameters and yield were studied. The results showed that rice leaf SPAD value and N content with urea treatment were the highest among 4 N forms at the heading and flowering stage. The order of rice yield and N use efficiency treated with different N forms were urea > ammonium sulfate > ammonium nitrate > sodium nitrate. The N application rate test showed that photochemical quantum efficiency and chemical quenching coefficient of rice leaves showed an inverted-V-type changing tendency with the highest value at 180 kg/hm(2) N treatment. Treatment with less than 180 kg/hm(2) N decreased the area and perimeter of small vascular bundles of the lateral leaves. Yield of early rice and later rice with 180 kg/hm(2) urea treatment was 17.42 to 33.28% and 6.17 to 21.28% higher than those of other N levels, respectively. The above results suggested that 180 kg/hm(2) of urea N are suitable and recommended for double-cropping rice planting in South China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据