4.5 Article

Physicochemical properties and enzymatic activity of wheat germ extract microencapsulated with spray and freeze drying

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 1192-1201

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2104

关键词

DPPH free radical scavenging activity; maltodextrin; microencapsulation; wheat germ; whey protein concentrate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the microencapsulation of wheat germ extract (WGE) using spray and freeze drying with different maltodextrin to whey protein concentrate (M-W) ratios. Results showed that increasing M-W ratios led to changes in physicochemical properties of the microcapsules, with spray drying showing superior effects compared to freeze drying.
Wheat germ is produced as a by-product during wheat milling operations and is a relatively inexpensive protein source that, in spite of its exclusive nutritional properties, is mostly used for animal feed formulation and has limited use in the food industry. In this study, wheat germ extract (WGE) was microencapsulated by spray and freeze drying and with different ratios of maltodextrin to whey protein concentrate (M-W) as the coating material and then physicochemical properties of the microcapsules were evaluated. Results showed decreased moisture content and increased solubility, lipase activity, acid phosphatase activity, and both lipase and acid phosphatase microencapsulation efficiency with increasing M-W ratios in both drying methods. The M-W ratios had no significant effects on the DPPH free radical scavenging activity in both methods. With increasing M-W ratios, particle size decreased and bulk density increased in the spray drying method, while particle size increased and bulk density decreased in the freeze drying method. Spray drying elevated solubility, DPPH free radical scavenging activity, lipase activity, acid phosphatase activity, and both lipase and acid phosphatase microencapsulation efficiency, in comparison with the freeze drying method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据