4.6 Article

Patient Monitoring by Abnormal Human Activity Recognition Based on CNN Architecture

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics9121993

关键词

deep learning; abnormal human activity; YOLO; patient care

资金

  1. IITP grant, Development of Self-learnable Mobile Recursive Neural Network Processor Technology Project [2020-0-01304]
  2. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) - Korea Government (MOTIE) [N0001883]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human action recognition has emerged as a challenging research domain for video understanding and analysis. Subsequently, extensive research has been conducted to achieve the improved performance for recognition of human actions. Human activity recognition has various real time applications, such as patient monitoring in which patients are being monitored among a group of normal people and then identified based on their abnormal activities. Our goal is to render a multi class abnormal action detection in individuals as well as in groups from video sequences to differentiate multiple abnormal human actions. In this paper, You Look only Once (YOLO) network is utilized as a backbone CNN model. For training the CNN model, we constructed a large dataset of patient videos by labeling each frame with a set of patient actions and the patient's positions. We retrained the back-bone CNN model with 23,040 labeled images of patient's actions for 32 epochs. Across each frame, the proposed model allocated a unique confidence score and action label for video sequences by finding the recurrent action label. The present study shows that the accuracy of abnormal action recognition is 96.8%. Our proposed approach differentiated abnormal actions with improved F1-Score of 89.2% which is higher than state-of-the-art techniques. The results indicate that the proposed framework can be beneficial to hospitals and elder care homes for patient monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据