4.5 Article

Forest biomass as a viable pathway for sustainable energy supply in isolated villages of Amazonia

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100609

关键词

Wood waste; Clean energy production; Gasification; Sustainable forest management

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq/Brazil [479869/2007-3]
  2. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that biomass residues can be a viable option for electricity generation in isolated villages, with gasification and Rankine cycle systems showing cost advantages and meeting the energy demand effectively.
In the present study, we evaluate the potential of biomass residues from sustainable forest management for electricity generation in an isolated village in the Amazon rainforest. We compared the following alternatives for electricity generation: thermoelectric diesel plant, biomass gasification and Rankine cycle system and found that biomass fuel systems (gasification and Rankine cycle) may yield up enough energy to meet the demand of the studied village. A comparative analysis of the different electricity generation technologies shows that gasification and Rankine cycle have an implementation cost 1.2 times higher than that estimated for the diesel thermoelectric power plant. However, the annual operational and maintenance cost of the biomass fuel system is about 50% lower than that estimated for the diesel plant. That means that in less than two years of operation and maintenance, the gasification or Rankine cycle plants pay off the implementation cost, when compared to the diesel plant. Besides ensuring the supply of electricity from a clean, renewable source, the biomass fuel systems reduce community's dependence on external sources of energy. This leads to greater autonomy and involvement of residents in the management of the generation system, creates more local jobs and income generation, contributing to the sustainable development of the local economy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据