4.6 Review

Apple Fermented Products: An Overview of Technology, Properties and Health Effects

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9020223

关键词

apple pomace; cider; vinegar; probiotic beverage; spirit; alcoholic fermentation; malolactic fermentation; acetic fermentation

资金

  1. Instituto Politecnico de Castelo Branco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apples and their by-products are being redirected to pharmaceutical, canning and beverages industries globally. Fermentation increases the bioavailability of bioactive compounds in apples, impacting the properties, composition, health benefits, and sensory profile. Apple vinegar and probiotic apple beverages are considered safe and healthy products by consumers.
As an easily adapted culture, with overloaded production in some parts of the globe, apples and their by-products are being redirected to pharmaceutical, canning and beverages industries, both alcoholic and non-alcoholic. Fermentation is generally considered to increase the bioavailability of bioactive compounds found in apple, by impacting, through a high degree of changes, the product's properties, including composition and health-promoting attributes, as well as their sensory profile. Probiotic apple beverages and apple vinegar are generally considered as safe and healthy products by the consumers. Recently, contributions to human health, both in vivo and in vitro studies, of non-alcoholic fermented apple-based products have been described. This review highlighted the advances in the process optimization of apple-based products considering vinegar, cider, pomace, probiotic beverages and spirits' technologies. The different processing impacts on physical-chemical, nutritional and sensory profiles of these products are also presented. Additionally, the harmful effects of toxic compounds and strategies to limit their content in cider and apple spirits are illustrated. New trends of fermented apple-based products applicability in tangential industries are summarized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据