4.6 Review

Novel Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539527

关键词

combination therapies; immunotherapy; targeted therapy; chemotherapy; bladder cancer

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81703008,81874212]
  2. Huxiang HighLevel Talent Innovation Team [2018RS3072]
  3. Major Scientific and Technological Projects for Collaborative Prevention and Control of Birth Defect in Hunan Province [2019SK1012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bladder cancer therapy has seen two major breakthroughs with immune checkpoint inhibitors and FGFR-TKI erdafitinib, but challenges like low response rates and resistance remain. Combining immunotherapy with targeted drugs is a promising option to enhance response and combat resistance in managing bladder cancer.
Bladder cancer is the ninth most frequently diagnosed cancer world-wide and ranks 13th in cancer-related deaths. Two tremendous breakthroughs in bladder cancer therapy over the last decades are the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)and the fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (FGFR-TKI) erdafitinib for treating this deadly disease. Despite the beneficial effects of these approaches, the low response rate and the potential resistance of the cancer are major concerns. Hence, novel combination therapies to overcome these limitations have been investigated. In this context, combining immunotherapy with targeted drugs is an appealing therapeutic option to improve response and reduce the emergence of resistance in the management of bladder cancer. In this review, the rationale of using different therapeutic combinations is discussed according to the mechanistic differences, emphasizing the efficacy and safety based on evidence collected from preclinical and clinical studies. Finally, we highlight the limitations of these combinations and provide suggestions for further efforts in this challenging field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据