4.6 Article

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Meningiomas

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.592470

关键词

meningioma; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; World Health Organization grade I; recurrence; progression-free survival

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [18K19622]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K19622] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Meningiomas are the most common benign intracranial tumors. However, even WHO grade I meningiomas occasionally show local tumor recurrence. Prognostic factors for meningiomas have not been fully established. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported as a prognostic factor for several solid tumors. The prognostic value of NLR in meningiomas has been analyzed in few studies. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 160 patients who underwent surgery for meningiomas between October 2010 and September 2017. We analyzed the associations between patients' clinical data (sex, age, primary/recurrent, WHO grade, extent of removal, tumor location, peritumoral brain edema, and preoperative laboratory data) and clinical outcomes, including recurrence and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Forty-four meningiomas recurred within the follow-up period of 3.8 years. WHO grade II, III, subtotal removal, history of recurrence, Ki-67 labeling index >= 3.0, and preoperative NLR value >= 2.6 were significantly associated with shorter PFS (P < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.002, < 0.001, and 0.015, respectively). Furthermore, NLR >= 2.6 was also significantly associated with shorter PFS in a subgroup analysis of WHO grade I meningiomas (P = 0.003). In univariate and multivariate analyses, NLR >= 2.6 remained as a significant predictive factor for shorter PFS in patients with meningioma (P = 0.014). Conclusions NLR may be a cost-effective and novel preoperatively usable biomarker in patients with meningiomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据