4.6 Article

Effect of a Lens Protein in Low-Temperature Culture of Novel Immortalized Human Lens Epithelial Cells (iHLEC-NY2)

期刊

CELLS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells9122670

关键词

immortalized human lens epithelial cell clone NY2; iHLEC-NY2; low-temperature culture; computer simulation; environmental temperature; crystalline lens temperature; α A crystallin; amyloid β

资金

  1. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI grant [20K09815]
  2. Kanazawa Medical University [S2020-4]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K09815] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of nuclear cataracts was observed to be significantly higher among residents of tropical and subtropical regions compared to those of temperate and subarctic regions. We hypothesized that elevated environmental temperatures may pose a risk of nuclear cataract development. The results of our in silico simulation revealed that in temperate and tropical regions, the human lens temperature ranges from 35.0 degrees C to 37.5 degrees C depending on the environmental temperature. The medium temperature changes during the replacement regularly in the cell culture experiment were carefully monitored using a sensor connected to a thermometer and showed a decrease of 1.9 degrees C, 3.0 degrees C, 1.7 degrees C, and 0.1 degrees C, after 5 min when setting the temperature of the heat plate device at 35.0 degrees C, 37.5 degrees C, 40.0 degrees C, and 42.5 degrees C, respectively. In the newly created immortalized human lens epithelial cell line clone NY2 (iHLEC-NY2), the amounts of RNA synthesis of alpha A crystallin, protein expression, and amyloid beta (A beta)1-40 secreted into the medium were increased at the culture temperature of 37.5 degrees C compared to 35.0 degrees C. In short-term culture experiments, the secretion of A beta 1-40 observed in cataracts was increased at 37.5 degrees C compared to 35.0 degrees C, suggesting that the long-term exposure to a high-temperature environment may increase the risk of cataracts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据