4.7 Article

Uterine Fundus Remodeling after Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: A Prospective Pilot Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020260

关键词

septate uterus; uterine malformation; uterine fundus; hysteroscopy; ultrasound; remodeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study found that after hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus, three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound showed a significant increase in residual septum, myometrial wall thickness, and total fundal wall thickness. Approximately 72% of patients required a second surgery, and the shape of the uterine fundus changed in 58% of cases.
The septate uterus is the most common congenital uterine malformation and is treated by hysteroscopic metroplasty. There are few studies on the fundal uterine changes that occur after surgery. We designed a pilot prospective observational study to evaluate by three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS) the changes not only of the internal fundal uterine profile, but also of the external one, after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Sixty women who underwent hysteroscopic metroplasty for partial or complete uterine septum (U2a and U2b subclasses of ESHRE/ESGE classification) were enrolled. We performed 3D-TVS after surgery confirming optimal removal of the septum. However, at ultrasound follow-up after three months, we observed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the residual septum (Zr) (3.7 mm (95% CI: 3.1-4.4)), the myometrial wall thickness (Y) (2.5 mm (95% CI: 2.0-3.0)) and the total fundal wall thickness (Y + Zr) (6.2 mm (95% CI: 5.5-6.9)). Forty-three patients (72%) required a second step of hysteroscopic metroplasty. Moreover, the shape of uterine fundus changed in 58% of cases. We actually observed a remodeling of the uterine fundus with modifications of its external and internal profiles. Therefore, we propose to always perform a second ultrasound look at least three months after the metroplasty to identify cases that require a second- step metroplasty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据