4.7 Review

The Brain-Gut Axis: Psychological Functioning and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030377

关键词

neuropsychology; gastroenterology; inflammatory bowel diseases; mental disorders; anti-depressive agents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The brain-gut axis plays a significant role in the psychological functioning of patients with IBD, with depression and anxiety often being under-diagnosed. Personalized pathways of psychological support are crucial for improving the quality of life in these patients.
The brain-gut axis represents a complex bi-directional system comprising multiple interconnections between the neuroendocrine pathways, the autonomous nervous system and the gastrointestinal tract. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic, relapsing-remitting inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with a multifactorial etiology. Depression and anxiety are prevalent among patients with chronic disorders characterized by a strong immune component, such as diabetes mellitus, cancer, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and IBD. Although psychological problems are an important aspect of morbidity and of impaired quality of life in patients with IBD, depression and anxiety continue to be under-diagnosed. There is lack of evidence regarding the exact mechanisms by which depression, anxiety and cognitive dysfunction may occur in these patients, and whether psychological disorders are the result of disease activity or determinants of the IBD occurrence. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the role of the brain-gut axis in the psychological functioning of patients with IBD, and discuss current preclinical and clinical data on the topic and therapeutic strategies potentially useful for the clinical management of these patients. Personalized pathways of psychological supports are needed to improve the quality of life in patients with IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据