4.7 Review

Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030453

关键词

ventricular assist device; driveline infections; exit-site; driveline tunnel; biofilms; epidemiology; prevention; treatment

资金

  1. Alfred Foundation
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1079421]
  3. Australian NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship [APP1117940]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ventricular assist device (VAD)-specific infections, particularly driveline infections, are a concerning complication of VAD implantation due to biofilm formation and migration. Despite multiple preventative strategies, driveline infections still have a high prevalence and unsatisfactory treatment outcomes.
Ventricular assist device (VAD)-specific infections, in particular, driveline infections, are a concerning complication of VAD implantation that often results in significant morbidity and even mortality. The presence of a percutaneous driveline at the skin exit-site and in the subcutaneous tunnel allows biofilm formation and migration by many bacterial and fungal pathogens. Biofilm formation is an important microbial strategy, providing a shield against antimicrobial treatment and human immune responses; biofilm migration facilitates the extension of infection to deeper tissues such as the pump pocket and the bloodstream. Despite the introduction of multiple preventative strategies, driveline infections still occur with a high prevalence of similar to 10-20% per year and their treatment outcomes are frequently unsatisfactory. Clinical diagnosis, prevention and management of driveline infections are being targeted to specific microbial pathogens grown as biofilms at the driveline exit-site or in the driveline tunnel. The purpose of this review is to improve the understanding of VAD-specific infections, from basic bench knowledge to clinical bedside experience, with a specific focus on the role of biofilms in driveline infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据