4.7 Article

Pan-Genotype Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Allows Transplantation of HCV-Positive Donor Kidneys to Negative Transplant Recipients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10010089

关键词

kidney transplantation; hepatitis C; virus transmission

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH Co.
  2. KGaA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully utilized HCV+ donors for transplantation and prevented HCV infection by using PrEP DAA. Transplant recipients showed good graft function and tolerability, with reduced waiting time when accepting HCV+ donors.
Transplant candidates are facing incremental mortality risks on the waiting list. Here, we report a novel strategy to expand the donor pool by including hepatitis C seropositive (HCV+) donors. We investigated a pre-exposure prophylactic (PrEP) treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) to allow transplantation for HCV seronegative (HCV-) kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with the aim to prevent HCV infection post transplantation. In this prospective trial, a pan-genotypic PrEP with daclatasvir and sofosbuvir once daily for 12 week was administered at transplantation. The primary endpoint sustained virological negativity (SVN) 12 weeks after the end of PrEP. Seven patients received a transplantation from four HCV+ donors. Accumulated waiting time was 70 +/- 31.3 months already. Of note, study subjects underwent transplantation 24.7 +/- 16.1 days after given consent. All KTR developed excellent graft function without any rejection episodes. One patient died with a functioning graft due to sepsis 13 months after transplantation. PrEP demonstrated efficacy with no signs of HCV transmission with excellent tolerability. Two out of four HCV+ donors were viremic at the time of explantation. Interestingly, KTR developed HCV antibodies also from non viramic donors. The acceptance of HCV+ donor was safe and reduced waiting time under the protection of PrEP DAA in kidney transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据