4.7 Review

Stratification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Following HCV Eradication or HBV Control

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020353

关键词

viral hepatitis; hepatocellular carcinoma; antivirals; risk scores; surveillance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma has decreased in patients infected with HCV and HBV thanks to antiviral drugs, but those with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis still face risk. Predictors of cancer in virus-free patients include comorbidities, liver inflammation, and non-invasive test results, allowing for stratification and surveillance. International guidelines recommend lifelong monitoring with ultrasound, and further research into more effective surveillance tools is needed for personalized management.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence has dramatically decreased in patients infected with HCV and HBV due to the widespread use of highly effective antiviral agents. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis following HCV clearance of in case of HBV control whatever the stage of fibrosis remains at risk of liver cancer development. Cancer predictors in these virus-free patients include routine parameters estimating coexisting comorbidities, persisting liver inflammation or function impairment, and results of non-invasive tests which can be easily combined into HCC risk scoring systems. The latter enables stratification according to various liver cancer incidences and allocation of patients into low, intermediate or high HCC risk probability groups. All international guidelines endorse lifelong surveillance of these patients using semi-annual ultrasound, with known sensibility issues. Refining HCC prediction in this growing population ultimately will trigger personalized management using more effective surveillance tools such as contrast-enhanced imaging techniques or circulating biomarkers while taking into account cost-effectiveness parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据