4.7 Article

Adolescent Sport Participation and Age at Menarche in Relation to Midlife Body Composition, Bone Mineral Density, Fitness, and Physical Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123797

关键词

adolescent athlete; female athlete; age at menarche; body composition; bone mineral density; physical performance; physical activity

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [275323, 309504, 314181]
  2. Juho Vainio Foundation
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [275323, 314181, 309504, 314181, 309504, 275323] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the associations of competitive sport participation in adolescence and age at menarche (AAM) with body composition, femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), physical performance, and physical activity (PA) in middle-aged women. 1098 women aged 47-55 years formed the sample of this retrospective study. Participants self-reported their PA level at age 13-16 years and AAM. The protocol also included dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, physical performance tests, and accelerometer-measured PA. Participants were divided into three groups according to their PA level at the age of 13-16 (no exercise, regular PA, and competitive sport) and according to their AAM (<= 12, 13, and >= 14 years). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, participation in competitive sport at age 13-16 was associated with higher midlife lean mass and BMD, and better physical performance compared to groups with no exercise or regular PA. Individuals with AAM >= 14 years had lower midlife BMI and fat mass than participants in the other AAM groups and pre- and perimenopausal women with AAM >= 14 years had lower BMD than those with AAM <= 12. The findings indicate that participation in competitive sport in adolescence is associated with healthier body composition, higher BMD, and better physical performance in midlife, but BMD might be impaired if menarche occurs late.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据