4.7 Article

Metabolic Interactions between Brachypodium and Pseudomonas fluorescens under Controlled Iron-Limited Conditions

期刊

MSYSTEMS
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00580-20

关键词

iron; grass; siderophore

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
  2. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a DOE user facility [22142]
  3. Linus Pauling Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL) [LDRD 204495]
  4. Simons Foundation [621513]
  5. DOE [DE-AC05-76RLO1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the metabolite exchange mechanism between the grass Brachypodium distachyon and the soil bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens under iron limitation. The results showed that the bacterium consumed root-exuded phytosiderophores in response to iron deficiency and altered the expression of defense-related genes in the plant roots. These findings provide insight into the molecular bases for stress response and metabolite exchange between interacting plants and bacteria under iron-deficient conditions.
Iron (Fe) availability has well-known effects on plant and microbial metabolism, but its effects on interspecies interactions are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate metabolite exchange between the grass Brachypodium distachyon strain Bd21 and the soil bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25::gfp/lux (SBW25) during Fe limitation under axenic conditions. We compared the transcriptional profiles and root exudate metabolites of B. distachyon plants grown semihydroponically with and without SBW25 inoculation and Fe amendment. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the hydroponic solution revealed an increase in the abundance of the phytosiderophores mugineic acid and deoxymugineic acid under Fe-limited conditions compared to Fe-replete conditions, indicating greater secretion by roots presumably to facilitate Fe uptake. In SBW25-inoculated roots, expression of genes encoding phytosiderophore biosynthesis and uptake proteins increased compared to that in sterile roots, but external phytosiderophore abundances decreased. P. fluorescens siderophores were not detected in treatments without Fe. Rather, expression of SBW25 genes encoding a porin, a transporter, and a monooxygenase was significantly upregulated in response to Fe deprivation. Collectively, these results suggest that SBW25 consumed root-exuded phytosiderophores in response to Fe deficiency, and we propose target genes that may be involved. SBW25 also altered the expression of root genes encoding defense-related enzymes and regulators, including thionin and cyanogenic glycoside production, chitinase, and peroxidase activity, and transcription factors. Our findings provide insights into the molecular bases for the stress response and metabolite exchange of interacting plants and bacteria under Fe-deficient conditions. IMPORTANCE Rhizosphere bacteria influence the growth of their host plant by consuming and producing metabolites, nutrients, and antibiotic compounds within the root system that affect plant metabolism. Under Fe-limited growth conditions, different plant and microbial species have distinct Fe acquisition strategies, often involving the secretion of strong Fe-binding chelators that scavenge Fe and facilitate uptake. Here, we studied interactions between P. fluorescens SBW25, a plant-colonizing bacterium that produces siderophores with antifungal properties, and B. distachyon, a genetic model for cereal grain and biofuel grasses. Under controlled growth conditions, bacterial siderophore production was inhibited in the root system of Fe-deficient plants, bacterial inoculation altered transcription of genes involved in defense and stress response in the roots of B. distachyon, and SBW25 degraded phytosiderophores secreted by the host plant. These findings provide mechanistic insight into interactions that may play a role in rhizosphere dynamics and plant health in soils with low Fe solubility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据