4.8 Article

Using migrating cells as probes to illuminate features in live embryonic tissues

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 49, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5546

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Faculty of the University of Muenster
  2. Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence [EXC 1003, FF-2017-14, PP-2016-10]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [RA863/11-1, CRC1348]
  4. DFG [CRC1348, DI 2205/2-1, DI2205/3-1, MA 6726/1]
  5. European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  6. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [05M16PMB]
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [777826]
  8. European Research Council (ERC, PolarizeMe) [771201]
  9. EMBO fellowship [ALTF 306-2018]
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [771201] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biophysical and biochemical properties of live tissues are important in the context of development and disease. Methods for evaluating these properties typically involve destroying the tissue or require specialized technology and complicated analyses. Here, we present a novel, noninvasive methodology for determining the spatial distribution of tissue features within embryos, making use of nondirectionally migrating cells and software we termed Landscape, which performs automatized high-throughput three-dimensional image registration. Using the live migrating cells as bioprobes, we identified structures within the zebrafish embryo that affect the distribution of the cells and studied one such structure constituting a physical barrier, which, in turn, influences amoeboid cell polarity. Overall, this work provides a unique approach for detecting tissue properties without interfering with animal's development. In addition, Landscape allows for integrating data from multiple samples, providing detailed and reliable quantitative evaluation of variable biological phenotypes in different organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据