4.8 Article

Surface lattice engineering through three-dimensional lead iodide perovskitoid for high-performance perovskite solar cells

期刊

CHEM
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 774-785

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.12.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  2. Alliance for Sustainable Energy, Limited Liability Company (LLC)
  3. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science within the U.S. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technologies Office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface modification with a new compound, Me-PDAI(2), on standard perovskite thin films can induce the formation of a thin perovskitoid surface layer, leading to improved efficiency and stability of the solar cells.
Surface modification of organic-inorganic halide perovskite thin films represents a promising approach to enhance the efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells. Here, we synthesized N-methyl-1,3-propane diammonium diiodide (Me-PDAI(2)) and found that Me-PDA(2+) can template a three-dimensional perovskitoid'' structure (Me-PDA)Pb2I6. Simple surface treatment with Me-PDAI(2) on top of a standard(FAPbI(3))(0.85)(MAPbI(2)Br)(0.10)(CsPbI3)(0.05) perovskite induces the formation of a thin (Me-PDA)Pb2I6 perovskitoid surface layer, leading to smoother surface texture, longer charge-carrier lifetime, higher charge-carrier mobility, and a reduced surface-defect density. With the perovskitoid surface modification, the device efficiency is significantly improved from 20.3% to 22.0% along with enhanced stability in both shelf life (ISOS-D-1 stability) and operation (ISOS-L-1 stability). We further demonstrated that the perovskitoid surface engineering approach is applicable to various perovskite compositions, including CsFAMA-, FAMA-, and MA-based lead halide perovskites, making perovskitoid an important design motif for perovskite surface engineering for enhanced device performance and stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据