4.4 Article

Insights into the Extraction of Actinides from Lanthanides Using 3,3'-Dimethoxy-phenyl-bis-1,2,4-triazinyl-2,6-pyridine Ligand - A DFT Study

期刊

CHEMISTRYSELECT
卷 5, 期 44, 页码 13895-13901

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/slct.202003240

关键词

Actinide extraction; BTP ligand; Density functional calculations; N ligands; Spent Nuclear Fuel

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology - Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB) [ECR/2017/001147]
  2. DST-SERB
  3. DST-FIST [SR/FST/CSI-090/2004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently reported 3,3'-dimethoxy-phenyl-bis-1,2,4-triazinyl-2,6-pyridine (DMOP- BTP) ligand is recognized as an efficient candidate for the stripping of actinides (An) from lanthanides (Ln) in nuclear wastes in nitric acid medium. However, the complexation behaviour and selectivity of this DMOP-BTP ligand towards An(III)/Ln(III) is still unclear. In order to understand the origin of complexation of this ligand, a series of metal ions (M3+=Ce, Nd, Eu, U, Am, Cm) have been chosen and its binding ability to form ML(NO3)(3) (L=DMOP- BTP) complex is studied using scalar relativistic ZORA/DFT calculations. Metal -Nitrogen bond lengths obtained from optimized geometries reveal that An(III) prefer binding to DMOP-BTP ligand compared to Ln(III). To elucidate the metal-ligand bonding nature, Mayer and Nalewajsk- Mrozek (NM) bond order analyses have been carried out. Quantum Theory of Atoms In Molecules (QTAIM) and Energy Decomposition Analysis (EDA) have been done using the optimized geometries to comprehend the bonding situation in these ML(NO3)(3) complexes. Results reveal that the bonds of An(III) ions tend to have a higher covalency compared to that of their lanthanide ions. Furthermore, it is understood that the NO3 ions around the metal ion also take part in interaction with the ligand and help in the stabilization of the metal complex. Thus, this work throws light on the preferential selectivity of the DMOP- BTP ligand for An(III) ions over Ln(III) ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据