4.6 Article

Feasibility study of integrating the renewable energy system in Popova Island using the Monte Carlo model and HOMER

期刊

ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100607

关键词

Energy mix system; LCOE; Probabilistic model; Uncertainty analysis

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation & Planning - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20194210200010]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Research grant - Ministry of Science and ICT [C0-2407]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20194210200010] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper conducts a feasibility study on integrating renewable energy generation into the energy system of Popova Island, using the Monte Carlo method and the HOMER energy model. Multiple result scenarios are provided to stakeholders, showcasing the potential benefits of increased renewables and reduced electricity costs.
Given that the integration of renewable energy generation systems may have the potential to satisfy the electrical requirements of remote areas, this paper consists of a feasibility study with the focus on integrating renewable generation into the energy system of Popova Island. It adopts an analytical approach that consists in applying the Monte Carlo method, an energy systems model, and then evaluating the financial outcomes. In so doing, the approach takes into account the inherent uncertainties and risks of various input parameters. Thus, Multiple Monte Carlo-based parameterisations define scenarios that are fed into the Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) energy model. The broad set of result scenarios can provide a valuable reference for stakeholders, and effectively communicate its potential for increased renewables, the resulting system configurations, and reduced electricity costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据