4.6 Article

Optimization of the Corrosion Resistance of Electroless Ni-W-P Coatings on Magnesium Alloys by the Response Surface Methodology

期刊

COATINGS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11010018

关键词

optimization; electroless plating; Ni– W– P coating; response surface methodology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51701050]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2018057, E2016022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research optimized the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-W-P alloy-coated AZ91D magnesium alloy using response surface methodology. The study found that sodium tungstate concentration had the greatest influence on the corrosion resistance of the coating, and interactions among the variables significantly affected the corrosion resistance. The optimal technological parameters were determined to achieve the best corrosion resistance.
Plating processes greatly affect the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-W-P coatings on magnesium alloys. In the present research, the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-W-P alloy-coated AZ91D magnesium alloy was optimized by the response surface methodology. The optimum technological parameters of the plating process were determined by establishing a quadratic regression model, and the influence of these variables and their interactions on the corrosion resistance of the coating was analyzed. The optimum technological parameters of the electroless plating process were nickel sulfate concentration = 20 g/L, sodium tungstate concentration = 15 g/L, sodium hypophosphite concentration = 30 g/L, bath temperature = 60 degrees C, and bath pH = 9.3. Under these conditions, the coating had the best corrosion resistance. Among the aforementioned five variables, sodium tungstate concentration had the most significant influence on the corrosion resistance of the coating. Different degrees of interactions among the variables greatly affected the corrosion resistance of the coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据