4.6 Article

Drosophila suzukii avoidance of microbes in oviposition choice

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201601

关键词

mechanosensory stimulus; decision-making; acetic acid bacteria; Gluconobacter; Acetobacter; spotted-wing Drosophila

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19H03276]
  2. Department of Defense United States Army Research Office [W911NF1610216]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1P20GM125508]
  4. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1610216] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the presence of commensal microbes affects egg laying of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes positively, but negatively impacts D. suzukii. This suggests a significant change in how females of D. suzukii respond to chemical cues produced by microbes. Additionally, the hardness of the substrate influences the choice of oviposition site by interacting with chemosensory-guided decisions.
While the majority of Drosophila species lays eggs onto fermented fruits, females of Drosophila suzukii pierce the skin and lay eggs into ripening fruits using their serrated ovipositors. The changes of oviposition site preference must have accompanied this niche exploitation. In this study, we established an oviposition assay to investigate the effects of commensal microbes deposited by conspecific and heterospecific individuals and showed that the presence of microbes on the oviposition substrate enhances egg laying of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes, but discourages that of D. suzukii. This result suggests that a drastic change has taken place in the lineage leading to D. suzukii in how females respond to chemical cues produced by microbes. We also found that hardness of the substrate, resembling that of either ripening or damaged and fermenting fruits, affects the response to microbial growth, indicating that mechanosensory stimuli interact with chemosensory-guided decisions to select or avoid oviposition sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据