4.5 Review

Clinical Management of Anemia in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: An Update on Emerging Therapeutic Options

期刊

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 645-657

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S240600

关键词

myelodysplastic syndrome; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents; novel agents; clinical trials

类别

资金

  1. NCI's Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award (CCITLA)
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30 CA016359]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For patients with LR-MDS, the goal is to alleviate symptoms and reduce transfusion burden associated with anemia. In addition to traditional treatments like supportive transfusions and ESAs, there are other therapeutic options available, such as luspatercept and lenalidomide, with novel agents like imetelstat and roxadustat in development.
For the majority of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), one of the primary clinical goals is to alleviate the symptoms associated with the resultant cytopenias and to minimize the transfusion burden. While supportive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may lead to clinical improvement, frequent transfusions are often complicated by iron overload and decreased quality of life; furthermore, most patients either do not respond to ESAs or will eventually develop resistance. As such, there is a great need for further therapeutic options in the management of anemia related to MDS. Several additional therapeutics are now available in select patients with LR-MDS and symptomatic anemia including luspatercept, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive therapy. Furthermore, several novel agents are currently in development to address this area of clinical need such as imetelstat and roxadustat. In this article, we review the currently available therapeutic options for symptomatic anemia in LR-MDS as well as review the therapeutic agents in development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据