4.8 Review

Cascading Failures in Internet of Things: Review and Perspectives on Reliability and Resilience

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 44-64

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3018687

关键词

Power system faults; Power system protection; Internet of Things; Reliability; Biological system modeling; Resilience; Mathematical model; Cascading failure; interdependence; Internet of Things (IoT); reliability; resilience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Internet of Things, devices collaborate in collecting and processing data, but cascading failures can lead to catastrophic issues. Understanding the causes of cascading failures and modeling them is crucial for ensuring the reliability of IoT systems.
In the Internet of Things (IoT), various devices operate collaboratively in collecting data, relaying information to one another, and processing information intelligently. Due to interactions and dependencies between the IoT devices, the malfunction of one device may trigger a cascade of unexpected and often undesired state changes of other devices, introducing or accelerating catastrophic cascading failures. Understanding the causes of cascading failures and modeling their behavior and effects is crucial for guaranteeing the reliability of IoT systems and delivering the desired quality of service. This article systematically reviews cascading failures modeling and reliability analysis methodologies, as well as mitigation strategies for building the resilience of IoT systems against cascading failures. The review covers diverse IoT applications, from smart grids to smart homes, from sensor networks to IoT cloud computing, and from transportation networks to interdependent infrastructure networks. Opportunities and open research issues are also discussed in relation to restrictions of the current cascading failure models and methods, and potential new technologies and complexity of the constantly evolving IoT systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据