4.7 Article

SECAT: Quantifying Protein Complex Dynamics across Cell States by Network-Centric Analysis of SEC-SWATH-MS Profiles

期刊

CELL SYSTEMS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 589-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.11.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2EZP3_175127, P400PB_183933, 31003A_16643]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01GM137031]
  4. European Research Council [ERC-20140AdG 670821]
  5. NCI [U54 CA209997]
  6. NIH [S10 OD012351, S10OD021764]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2EZP3_175127, P400PB_183933] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play critical functional and regulatory roles in cellular processes. They are essential for macromolecular complex formation, which in turn constitutes the basis for protein interaction networks that determine the functional state of a cell. We and others have previously shown that chromatographic fractionation of native protein complexes in combination with bottom-up mass spectrometric analysis of consecutive fractions supports the multiplexed characterization and detection of state-specific changes of protein complexes. In this study, we extend co-fractionation and mass spectrometric data analysis to perform quantitative, network-based studies of proteome organization, via the size-exclusion chromatography algorithmic toolkit (SECAT). This framework explicitly accounts for the dynamic nature and rewiring of protein complexes across multiple cell states and samples, thus, elucidating molecular mechanisms that are differentially implemented across different experimental settings. Systematic analysis of multiple datasets shows that SECAT represents a highly scalable and effective methodology to assess condition/state-specific protein-network state. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental Information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据