4.7 Article

Pulse-Chase Proteomics of the App Knockin Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease Reveals that Synaptic Dysfunction Originates in Presynaptic Terminals

期刊

CELL SYSTEMS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 141-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.11.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI CCSG [P30 CA060553]
  2. NIH, Mechanisms of Aging and Dementia [T32AG20506, F31AG059364, R01AG061787, R01AG061865, R21NS107761, R01MH099114, MH061876, AG061829]
  3. MCDB Neurodegenerative Disease Fund
  4. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  5. CNADC of Northwestern Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein turnover impairment at presynaptic terminals, particularly with synaptic vesicle-associated proteins, is observed at early stages of Alzheimer's disease. These impaired proteins interact with APP and Ab, leading to vulnerability of presynaptic terminals and manifestation of initial AD etiology.
Compromised protein homeostasis underlies accumulation of plaques and tangles in Alzheimer's disease (AD). To observe protein turnover at early stages of amyloid beta (Ab) proteotoxicity, we performed pulsechase proteomics on mouse brains in three genetic models of AD that knock in alleles of amyloid precursor protein (APP) prior to the accumulation of plaques and during disease progression. At initial stages of Ab accumulation, the turnover of proteins associated with presynaptic terminals is selectively impaired. Presynaptic proteins with impaired turnover, particularly synaptic vesicle (SV)-associated proteins, have elevated levels, misfold in both a plaque-dependent and -independent manner, and interact with APP and Ab. Concurrent with elevated levels of SV-associated proteins, we found an enlargement of the SV pool as well as enhancement of presynaptic potentiation. Together, our findings reveal that the presynaptic terminal is particularly vulnerable and represents a critical site for manifestation of initial AD etiology. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental Information.Y

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据