3.9 Article

Predicting distributions of rare species: the case of the false coral snake Rhinobothryum bovallii (Serpentes: Colubridae)

期刊

PHYLLOMEDUSA
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 141-164

出版社

UNIV SAO PAULO, ESALQ
DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v19i2p141-164

关键词

core habitat areas; disjunct distribution; marginal habitat; species distribution models

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Typically, the lack of enough high-quality occurrence data makes it difficult to define the geographic distribution of rare species. However, species distribution models provide a powerful tool for biodiversity management, including efforts to predict the distributions of rare species. Herein, new and historical data are used to model the distribution of the False Tree Coral snake, Rhinobothryum bovallii. The prediction map reveals a disjunct distribution for this species, from the Central American Isthmus to the northwestern portion of South America, with the species occupying lowlands and premontane forests below about 1500 m elevation. We identified 491,516 km(2) of suitable habitat for R. bovallii (minimum training presence threshold of 0.424) and 59,353 km(2) of core habitat, with concentrations in three relatively isolated core areas (10-percentile training presence threshold of 0.396), as follow: (1) a northern core along the Pacific and Caribbean coasts of Panama; (2) a central core in the Middle Magdalena Valley in Colombia; and (3) a southern core in the Ecuadorian Choco. The occurrence of this species has a strong positive association with low precipitation seasonality, high precipitation in the warmest quarter, and low variability in annual temperature. Xeric and semiarid areas are unsuitable for this species and may pose environmental barriers limiting its distributional range. These results may lead to the discovery of additional populations of R. bovallii, identify priority survey areas, and by determining the extent of its natural habitat promote effective conservation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据