4.5 Article

Nursing students' experiences of a global outreach program: A mixed-method study

期刊

NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102927

关键词

Nursing students; Self-efficacy; Education; Global health problems; Cultural diversity

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of a global outreach program on global health competency and cultural self-efficacy in Korean university nursing students. Both quantitative and qualitative data showed that the program significantly improved the students' global health competency and cultural self-efficacy. The findings suggest that the program was effective in enhancing nursing students' abilities in global health and intercultural communication.
Global health competency is an essential capacity for nursing students. This study evaluated the effect of a global outreach program on global health competency and cultural self-efficacy in nursing students and examined the students' experiences with the program. Participants included thirty-one undergraduate nursing students at a university in Seoul, Republic of Korea, who participated in a global outreach program in 2015 and 2016. Quantitative data were collected before and after program participation using questionnaires evaluating global health competency and cultural self-efficacy, and were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. Both global health competency and cultural self-efficacy increased significantly after the global outreach program. Qualitative data were collected via focus group interviews and reflective journals, and were analyzed using conventional content analysis and thematic analysis, respectively. The results of the content and thematic analyses were compared, and two themes and eight-sub-themes were finally extracted through the data analysis. The program was effective in improving nursing students' global health competency and cultural self-efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据