4.6 Article

Synthesis, microstructure, and properties of high purity Mo2TiAlC2 ceramics fabricated by spark plasma sintering

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CERAMICS
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 759-768

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-020-0412-7

关键词

MAX phase; Mo2TiAlC2; synthesis; microstructure; properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, microstructure, and properties of high purity dense bulk Mo2TiAlC2 ceramics were studied. High purity Mo2TiAlC2 powder was synthesized at 1873 K starting from Mo, Ti, Al, and graphite powders with a molar ratio of 2:1:1.25:2. The synthesis mechanism of Mo2TiAlC2 was explored by analyzing the compositions of samples sintered at different temperatures. It was found that the Mo2TiAlC2 phase was formed from the reaction among Mo3Al2C, Mo2C, TiC, and C. Dense Mo2TiAlC2 bulk sample was prepared by spark plasma sintering (SPS) at 1673 K under a pressure of 40 MPa. The relative density of the dense sample was 98.3%. The mean grain size was 3.5 mu m in length and 1.5 mu m in width. The typical layered structure could be clearly observed. The electrical conductivity of Mo2TiAlC2 ceramic measured at the temperature range of 2-300 K decreased from 0.95 x 10(6) to 0.77 x 10(6) omega-1 center dot m-1. Thermal conductivity measured at the temperature range of 300-1273 K decreased from 8.0 to 6.4 W center dot(m center dot K)(-1). The thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) of Mo2TiAlC2 measured at the temperature of 350-1100 K was calculated as 9.0 x 10(-6) K-1. Additionally, the layered structure and fine grain size benefited for excellent mechanical properties of low intrinsic Vickers hardness of 5.2 GPa, high flexural strength of 407.9 MPa, high fracture toughness of 6.5 MPa center dot m(1/2), and high compressive strength of 1079 MPa. Even at the indentation load of 300 N, the residual flexural strength could hold 84% of the value of undamaged one, indicating remarkable damage tolerance. Furthermore, it was confirmed that Mo2TiAlC2 ceramic had a good oxidation resistance below 1200 K in the air.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据