4.5 Article

Research on Large-Scale Urban Shrinkage and Expansion in the Yellow River Affected Area Using Night Light Data

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10010005

关键词

night light data; urban shrinkage; urban expansion; natural city; Yellow River affected area

资金

  1. Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology Research Project [212102310019]
  2. Ministry of Education [2020M19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study accurately identified the shrinkage and expansion of cities in the Yellow River affected area using POI data and night light data, showing that shrinking and expanding cities have different spatial distributions and are typically smaller in size.
As the land use issue, caused by urban shrinkage in China, is becoming more and more prominent, research on urban shrinkage and expansion has become particularly challenging and urgent. Based on the points of interest (POI) data, this paper redefines the scope, quantity, and area of natural cities by using threshold methods, which accurately identify the shrinkage and expansion of cities in the Yellow River affected area using night light data in 2013 and 2018. The results show that: (1) there are 3130 natural cities (48,118.75 km(2)) in the Yellow River affected area, including 604 shrinking cities (8407.50 km(2)) and 2165 expanding cities (32,972.75 km(2)). (2) The spatial distributions of shrinking and expanding cities are quite different. The shrinking cities are mainly located in the upper Yellow River affected area, except for the administrative cities of Lanzhou and Yinchuan; the expanding cities are mainly distributed in the middle and lower Yellow River affected area, and the administrative cities of Lanzhou and Yinchuan. (3) Shrinking and expanding cities are typically smaller cities. The research results provide a quick data supported approach for regional urban planning and land use management, for when regional and central governments formulate the outlines of urban development monitoring and regional planning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据