4.7 Article

Longitudinal Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on High-Touch Surfaces in a Community Setting

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00875

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF CBET [2028623]
  2. NIH [KL2TR002545]
  3. NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology Program [1906957]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1906957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [2028623] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 on high-touch surfaces in a community setting during a COVID-19 outbreak revealed a low risk of infection from contaminated surfaces. The percentage of positive samples from high-touch surfaces predicted variations in COVID-19 cases at the city-level with a 7-day lead time, suggesting that this surveillance method could serve as an early warning tool for monitoring case trends.
Environmental surveillance of surface contamination is an unexplored tool for understanding transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in community settings. We conducted longitudinal swab sampling of high-touch non-porous surfaces in a Massachusetts town during a COVID-19 outbreak from April to June 2020. Twenty-nine of 348 (8.3%) surface samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, including crosswalk buttons, trash can handles, and door handles of essential business entrances (grocery store, liquor store, bank, and gas station). The estimated risk of infection from touching a contaminated surface was low (less than 5 in 10,000) by quantitative microbial risk assessment, suggesting fomites play a minimal role in SARS-CoV-2 community transmission. The weekly percentage of positive samples (out of n = 33 unique surfaces per week) best predicted variation in city-level COVID-19 cases with a 7-day lead time. Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on high-touch surfaces may be a useful tool to provide early warning of COVID-19 case trends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据