4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Structural neighboring property for identifying protein-protein binding sites

期刊

BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-9-S5-S3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [NSFC] [61402326, 61373048]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 123013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The protein-protein interaction plays a key role in the control of many biological functions, such as drug design and functional analysis. Determination of binding sites is widely applied in molecular biology research. Therefore, many efficient methods have been developed for identifying binding sites. In this paper, we calculate structural neighboring property through Voronoi diagram. Using 6,438 complexes, we study local biases of structural neighboring property on interface. Results: We propose a novel statistical method to extract interacting residues, and interacting patches can be clustered as predicted interface residues. In addition, structural neighboring property can be adopted to construct a new energy function, for evaluating docking solutions. It includes new statistical property as well as existing energy items. Comparing to existing methods, our approach improves overall F-nat value by at least 3%. On Benchmark v4.0, our method has average I-rmsd value of 3.31 angstrom and overall F-nat value of 63%, which improves upon I-rmsd of 3.89 angstrom and F-nat of 49% for ZRANK, and I-rmsd of 3.99 angstrom and F-nat of 46% for ClusPro. On the CAPRI targets, our method has average I-rmsd value of 3.46 angstrom and overall F-nat value of 45%, which improves upon I-rmsd of 4.18 angstrom and F-nat of 40% for ZRANK, and I-rmsd of 5.12 angstrom and F-nat of 32% for ClusPro. Conclusions: Experiments show that our method achieves better results than some state-of-the-art methods for identifying protein-protein binding sites, with the prediction quality improved in terms of CAPRI evaluation criteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据