4.6 Article

Parameter Estimation of Compartmental Epidemiological Model Using Harmony Search Algorithm and Its Variants

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11031138

关键词

epidemiological modeling; epidemiological parameters; SIR model; harmony search

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiological models are crucial in understanding the spread and severity of infectious disease pandemics like COVID-19. Mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, typically in compartmental form, heavily relies on accurate estimation of epidemiological parameters. This study formulates parameter estimation as an optimization problem and applies the Harmony Search algorithm to obtain optimized parameters, showing it as a potential alternative tool for parameter estimation in compartmental epidemiological models.
Epidemiological models play a vital role in understanding the spread and severity of a pandemic of infectious disease, such as the COVID-19 global pandemic. The mathematical modeling of infectious diseases in the form of compartmental models are often employed in studying the probable outbreak growth. Such models heavily rely on a good estimation of the epidemiological parameters for simulating the outbreak trajectory. In this paper, the parameter estimation is formulated as an optimization problem and a metaheuristic algorithm is applied, namely Harmony Search (HS), in order to obtain the optimized epidemiological parameters. The application of HS in epidemiological modeling is demonstrated by implementing ten variants of HS algorithm on five COVID-19 data sets that were calibrated with the prototypical Susceptible-Infectious-Removed (SIR) compartmental model. Computational experiments indicated the ability of HS to be successfully applied to epidemiological modeling and as an efficacious estimator for the model parameters. In essence, HS is proposed as a potential alternative estimation tool for parameters of interest in compartmental epidemiological models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据