4.6 Article

Characterization of a 2D Electron Gas at the Interface of Atomic-Layer Deposited Al2O3/ZnO Thin Films for a Field-Effect Transistor

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202000876

关键词

2D electron gas; aluminum oxide; atomic layer deposition; field‐ effect transistors; zinc oxide

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A3B2079882]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of 2D electron gas (2DEG) at the interface of amorphous-Al2O3 (a-AO)/ZnO shows promising results, with the potential for application in 2D-based integrated circuits. The Al(CH3)(3) precursor induces 2DEG formation and the resulting transistor exhibits superior performance compared to previous devices.
The 2D electron gas (2DEG) phenomenon that occurs at the amorphous thin film hetero-oxide interface attracts great attention since it can avoid the use of a single-crystal oxide substrate. In this study, the analysis of 2DEG at the interface of amorphous-Al2O3 (a-AO)/ZnO is conducted using ZnO as the bottom substrate, where both the oxide films are grown by atomic layer deposition. Having used Al(CH3)(3) as the Al-precursor for the a-AO film growth on the previously grown ZnO film, its strong reducing power induces the 2DEG formation at the interface. As a result of the Hall measurement, the 2DEG at the a-AO/ZnO interface shows sheet resistance of 2.7 x 10(4) omega (-1) and Hall mobility of 8.4 cm(2) V-1 s(-1). Using angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the thickness of the 2DEG layer is calculated as 0.62 nm, which is approximate to 120% of the c-axis of the wurtzite ZnO unit cell. The field-effect transistor fabricated exhibits a threshold voltage of -2.4 V, sub-threshold swing of 0.33 V dec(-1), and on/off ratio of 9.4 x 10(6), which significantly outperforms similar devices from previous works. The outstanding operation of 2DEG at the interface of AO/ZnO as a channel presents a possibility for application to a 2D-based integrated circuit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据