4.3 Article

Assessing the life cycle of pests, Diaphania pulverulentalis (Hampson) and Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green, reared on transgenic mulberry

期刊

3 BIOTECH
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02621-7

关键词

Mulberry; Bio-safety; Pests; Transgenics; GM crops

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi [BT/TDS/121/SP20276/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the growth and development of the leaf roller and mealy bug on transgenic mulberry plants were not significantly different from those on wild type plants, indicating that their life cycles were not affected by feeding on transgenic mulberry plants.
The study aims at investigating the growth and development of two common pests in mulberry namely the leaf roller (Diaphania pulverulentalis) and mealy bug (Macconellicoccus hirsutus), reared on transgenic mulberry plants in comparison with the wild type plants V1, a ruling variety. Both the pests completed normal life cycle on all the four different transgenic plants (Ip::HVA1, Cp::HVA1, Cp::BCH1, Cp::osmotin and Ip::osmotin) expressing three different transgenes (HVA1, BCH1 and osmotin) in the presence of the marker gene NPTII. There was no significant difference in the incubation period of the eggs, growth of first to fifth instar larvae and total larval period of the leaf roller reared on transgenic and non-transgenic mulberry. The pre-pupal, pupal, adult stages and adult fecundity also did not differ. The variations in the duration of the different nymphal instars, and their total duration was not significant in the case of mealy bug, when reared on the transgenics. The adult longevity and total life span of female mealy bugs, and the pupal period and total life span of the male bugs were on par with those reared on the wild type plants. The study indicates that the life cycle of both the pests, which are common in a mulberry ecosystem, were not affected by feeding on any of the transgenic mulberry plants at any stage of their growth and development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据