4.6 Article

TINC-A Method to Dissect Regulatory Complexes at Single-Locus Resolution-Reveals an Extensive Protein Complex at the Nanog Promoter

期刊

STEM CELL REPORTS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 1246-1259

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.11.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1069830]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) Stem Cells Australia Special Initiative
  3. NHMRC CDF [APP1036587]
  4. ARC Future Fellowship [FT120100862, FT180100674]
  5. Silvia and Charles Viertel Senior Medical Research Fellowship
  6. ARC Center of Excellence program in Plant Energy Biology [CE140100008]
  7. HHMI International Research Scholarship
  8. NHMRC Investigator grant [GNT1178460]
  9. NHMRC ECF [APP1092280]
  10. State Government of Victoria
  11. Australian Government
  12. Australian Research Council [FT180100674] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular identity is ultimately dictated by the interaction of transcription factors with regulatory elements (REs) to control gene expression. Advances in epigenome profiling techniques have significantly increased our understanding of cell-specific utilization of REs. However, it remains difficult to dissect the majority of factors that interact with these REs due to the lack of appropriate techniques. Therefore, we developed TINC: TALE-mediated isolation of nuclear chromatin. Using this new method, we interrogated the protein complex formed at the Nanog promoter in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and identified many known and previously unknown interactors, including RCOR2. Further interrogation of the role of RCOR2 in ESCs revealed its involvement in the repression of lineage genes and the fine-tuning of pluripotency genes. Consequently, using the Nanog promoter as a paradigm, we demonstrated the power of TINC to provide insight into the molecular makeup of specific transcriptional complexes at individual REs as well as into cellular identity control in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据