4.7 Article

Full life-cycle toxicity assessment on triclosan using rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 30-35

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.12.043

关键词

Triclosan; Rotifer; Resting egg; Toxicity; Chronic effects

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Innovative Research Group of China [51421065]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012LZD03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triclosan (TCS) is an antimicrobial and is an aquatic contaminant. Little is known on aquatic toxicity of TCS. Rotifers are common members of freshwater zooplankton. In this study, Brachionus calyciflorus was chosen as a test organism to assess the acute and complete life cycle toxicity of TCS in this study. The acute toxicity results showed that the 24-h median lethal concentration (LC50) of TCS was 345 +/- 0.11 mu g/L (95% confidence limits of 212-564 mu g/L). Reproductive bioassays demonstrated that TCS could inhibit the population growth rate at the concentration higher than 1.0 mu g/L. Resting egg production encompasses the full life-cycle of rotifer, and thus its hatching rate were explored to assess the toxicity of TCS towards rotifer population at TCS concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 200 mu g/L at two different growth periods. When resting eggs were exposed to TCS during the formation period, 0.1 and 1.0 mu g/L of TCS increased the hatching rate from 0.402 to 0.502, and 0.475, respectively. Exposure to 100 and 200 mu g/L of TCS reduced the hatching rate to 0309 and 0275, respectively. When the resting eggs were formed in the control medium and hatched in medium with TCS, their hatching rates were not significantly influenced by TCS, except that 200 mu g/L of TCS decreased the hatching rate from 0.402 to 0.34 significantly. The effects of TCS exposure on the hatching rate during the formation period were greater than those during the resting egg hatching period. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据