4.5 Article

Optical and Electronic Properties of Symmetric InAs/(In,Al, Ga)As/InP Quantum Dots Formed by Ripening in Molecular Beam Epitaxy: A Potential System for Broad-Range Single-Photon Telecom Emitters

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.064054

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [2014/14/M/ST3/00821]
  2. Polish budgetary funds for science in 2018-2020 via the Diamond Grant program (Ministry for Science and Higher Education) [DI 2017 011747]
  3. National Science Centre (Poland) under the Etiuda 8 Grant [2020/36/T/ST5/00511]
  4. National Science Centre (Poland) grant Preludium 8 [2014/15/N/ST7/04708]
  5. BMBF Project (Q.Link.X)
  6. DFG (DeLiCom)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed experimental optical study supported by theoretical modeling of InAs quantum dots (QDs) embedded in an (In,Al,Ga)As barrier lattice matched to InP(001) grown with the use of a ripening step in molecular beam epitaxy. The method leads to the growth of in-plane symmetric QDs of low surface density, characterized by a multimodal size distribution resulting in a spectrally broad emission in the range of 1.4-2.0 mu m, essential for many near-infrared photonic applications. We find that, in contrast to the InAs/InP system, the multimodal distribution results here from a two-monolayer difference in QD height between consecutive families of dots. This may stem from the long-range ordering in the quaternary barrier alloy that stabilizes QD nucleation. Measuring the photoluminescence (PL) lifetime of the spectrally broad emission, we find a nearly dispersionless value of 1.3 +/- 0.3 ns. Finally, we examine the temperature dependence of emission characteristics. We underline the impact of localized states in the wetting layer playing the role of carrier reservoir during thermal carrier redistribution. We determine the hole escape to the (In,Al,Ga)As barrier to be a primary PL quenching mechanism in these QDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据