4.7 Review

Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of Major Hypotheses and Therapeutic Options in Nanotechnology

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11010059

关键词

Alzheimer’ s disease; neurodegeneration; blood– brain barrier; nanotechnological approaches; drug delivery

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [2018R1D1A1B07040673, 2014R1A5A2010008]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07040673] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease is a progressively fatal neurodegenerative disorder with symptoms like memory and cognition decline, and there is currently no cure available in the market. The major hurdles in finding a cure for Alzheimer's are the complexity of the disease pathogenesis and the inefficiency in drug delivery methods targeted for AD.
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressively fatal neurodegenerative disorder, is the most prominent form of dementia found today. Patients suffering from Alzheimer's begin to show the signs and symptoms, like decline in memory and cognition, long after the cellular damage has been initiated in their brain. There are several hypothesis for the neurodegeneration process; however, the lack of availability of in vivo models makes the recapitulation of AD in humans impossible. Moreover, the drugs currently available in the market serve to alleviate the symptoms and there is no cure for the disease. There have been two major hurdles in the process of finding the same-the inefficiency in cracking the complexity of the disease pathogenesis and the inefficiency in delivery of drugs targeted for AD. This review discusses the different drugs that have been designed over the recent years and the drug delivery options in the field of nanotechnology that have been found most feasible in surpassing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reaching the brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据