4.7 Article

miR-301a-PTEN-AKT Signaling Induces Cardiomyocyte Proliferation and Promotes Cardiac Repair Post-MI

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 251-262

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.08.033

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81800243]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18411965900]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22120180103, 22120180125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult hearts are hard to recover after cardiac injury due to the limited proliferative ability of cardiomyocytes. Emerging evidence indicates the induction of cell cycle reentry of cardiomyocytes by special treatment or stimulation, which offers adult heart regenerative potential. Herein, a microRNA (miRNA) screening in cardiomyocytes identified miR-301a enriched specially in the neonatal cardiomyocytes from rats and mice. Overexpression of miR-301a in primary neonatal cardiomyocytes and H9C2 cells induced G1/S transition of the cell cycle, promoted cellular proliferation, and protected cardiomyocytes against hypoxiainduced apoptosis. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)9-mediated cardiac delivery of miR-301a to the mice model with myocardial infarction (MI) dramatically promoted cardiac repair post-MI in vivo. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway was confirmed to mediate miR-301a-induced cell proliferation in cardiomyocytes. Loss of function of PTEN mimicked the miR-301a-induced phenotype, while gain of function of PTEN attenuated the miR301a-induced cell proliferation in cardiomyocytes. Application of RG7440, a small molecule inhibitor of AKT, blocked the function of miR-301a in cardiomyocytes. The current study revealed a miRNA signaling in inducing the cell cycle reentry of cardiomyocytes in the injured heart, and it demonstrated the miR-301a/ PTEN/AKT signaling as a potential therapeutic target to reconstitute lost cardiomyocytes in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据